The most
fundamental limitation of Competency Assessment Tools is that they are all
subjective in that they rely on the assessor’s (whether HR Professional, Line
Manager, Trained Observer) subjective judgement of the candidate’s behaviour
with respect to the Acquired Competency.
Secondly, in
many instances they suffer from design flaws. If the interview question, or the
work sample test, or the ACT simulation, does not ask the right question, or
structure the question properly, or structure the work sample test or the
simulation correctly then the outcome will be flawed. If an instrument is
poorly designed, one cannot expect an accurate outcome.
There is a
trend nowadays to use “off the shelf” assessment center exercises that can be
purchased from developers of assessment material. This can however be a
counterproductive exercise if the exercises do not accurately reflect the job
being assessed for, or do not assess the competencies relevant to the job.
Often, this is the case, and we advocate caution in the use of off the shelf
assessment exercises as they have often not been properly validated nor comply
with the criteria set out by the International Task Force on Assessment Centers.
There are
numerous other limitations.
Just remember in a nutshell, that it is much more
difficult to objectively assess Competencies than Capabilities. Standardised
tests for assessing acquired competencies, that possess the psychometric
properties such as norms, validation, reliability, generalisability do not exist.
This is precisely what differentiates Psychometric Tests and Competency
Assessment Tools. As previously discussed, Psychometric Tests such as cognitive
and personality tests have been developed by research psychologists and are
subjected to rigorous statistical, test design and standardisation procedures
that ensure that one can use them confidently as scientifically valid and
reliable instruments to assess Capability.